The phenomenon of systemic changes in the fortunes of social groups, such as aristocracy versus the bourgeoisie in the nineteenth century Europe or, contemporarily, second-generation immigrants versus native population, is hard to reconcile with traditional macroeconomic models of intergenerational mobility. This paper, therefore, proposes a theory of endogenous reversal of fortune, whereby instilling strict work norms is an instrument to address moral hazard in poor families more so than in rich families, which is consistent with empirical regularities pertaining to work attitudes. The mechanism implies that hard-working children of the poor may eventually overtake leisure prone children of the rich. This evolution, in particular, of work norms, is endogenously determined and is, therefore a better explanation of the rise and the fall of population groups than the existing theories relying on exogenous ability variations. |
