IZA

Logo
Strike Three: Umpires' Demand for Discrimination
by Christopher A. Parsons, Johan Sulaeman, Michael C. Yates, Daniel S. Hamermesh
(December 2008)
published in: American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (4), 1410-1435

Abstract:
We explore how umpires' racial/ethnic preferences are expressed in their evaluation of Major League Baseball pitchers. Controlling for umpire, pitcher, batter and catcher fixed effects and many other factors, strikes are more likely to be called if the umpire and pitcher match race/ethnicity. This effect only exists where there is little scrutiny of umpires' behavior in ballparks without computerized systems monitoring umpires' calls, at poorly attended games, and when the called pitch cannot determine the outcome of the at-bat. If a pitcher shares the home-plate umpire's race/ethnicity, he gives up fewer hits, strikes out more batters, and improves his team's chance of winning. The general implication is that standard measures of salary discrimination that adjust for measured productivity may be flawed. We derive the magnitude of the bias generally and apply it to several examples.
Text: See Discussion Paper No. 3899